Categories
Philosophy

Healthcare Case Analysis Overview and Instructions If you have not done so, be

Healthcare Case Analysis
Overview and Instructions
If you have not done so, be sure to read the Case Analysis Structure Overview.
In this case analysis you have five tasks:
Give a clear and concise explanation of the case at hand.
Give a thorough, philosophical exegesis of the relevant aspects of Bradley’s and Peikoff’s arguments. (Click here for some tips on how to do a successful exegesis.)
Present an argument applying the relevant philosophers to the case at hand. This should include an argument justifying in which world each philosopher would place Jim and why.
Present an argument explaining why one of the philosophers can be viewed as offering a more successful solution to the case at hand.
In no more than one paragraph, explain what solution you would propose for Jim.
Case
Consider Jim. Jim has worked in middle management his entire life. He had the option of paying into his company’s managed healthcare system but decided he wanted to keep the money instead and invest it in case he ever needed acute medical treatment. Unfortunately, on his 40th birthday, Jim decided to buy a red Corvette with that money. 6 months later, Jim went to a doctor to see why he was feeling so awful. The doctor diagnosed Jim with emphysema, diabetes, and kidney failure. All three of these conditions are the result of Jim’s lifestyle choices: smoking, poor eating and exercise habits, and excessive drinking. These conditions are chronic and will require treatment for the rest of Jim’s life including cutting-edge lung and kidney treatments and weekly meetings with a nutritionist, endocrinologist, cardiologist, etc.
Options
Here are the two possible healthcare “worlds” for Jim (he must be “placed” in one of them):
Participate in a universal healthcare system, paid for by income taxes, which doesn’t provide Jim with the latest and greatest medical technology but does meet basic standards of care.
Participate in a pay-for-service system, which allows Jim to pay for whatever treatment he wants and/or can afford but will not treat him unless he pays for the service.
Upload your Healthcare Case Analysis here.

Categories
Philosophy

Healthcare Forum Instructions You are going to discuss Healthcare in terms of a

Healthcare Forum
Instructions
You are going to discuss Healthcare in terms of a current event. Your initial post and peer reply should each consist of approximately 150-200 words.
Part I (Original Post)
Find a current event or op-ed that deals with healthcare and discuss it here. Be sure to bring one of this week’s readings to bear on the discussion.
Is Healthcare a, Right?
Overview
Does the “right to life” imply a “right to the services necessary to keep us alive?” Extending from the discussion of welfare, here we’ll examine whether healthcare (and universal healthcare in particular) is a basic human right, a way to control costs, or a secret governmental ploy to enslave doctors and undermine American values.
Read
Peikoff
Notes on Peikoff
Bradley
Notes on Bradley
Complete
Contribute your original (first) post and peer reply to the Healthcare Forum
Write your Healthcare Case Analysis

Categories
Philosophy

Write an essay that addresses a philosophic issue of your choosing. (One sugges

Write an essay that addresses a philosophic issue of your choosing. (One suggested possible topic is to identify a philosophical issue/ idea developed by PreSocratic philosophers utilized or challenged by Plato and or Aristotle. In this case, give at least two examples, identifying the PreSocratic philosophers and their ideas and how Plato and Aristotle utilized or modified that idea. This essay must be a minimum of 750 words but can be longer. The last paragraph should be your own ideas on how you might address the issues that you discussed earlier in the essay. 750 words, 5 paragraphs

Categories
Philosophy

Write an essay that addresses a philosophic issue of your choosing. (One sugges

Write an essay that addresses a philosophic issue of your choosing. (One suggested possible topic is to identify a philosophical issue/ idea developed by PreSocratic philosophers utilized or challenged by Plato and or Aristotle. In this case, give at least two examples, identifying the PreSocratic philosophers and their ideas and how Plato and Aristotle utilized or modified that idea. This essay must be a minimum of 750 words but can be longer. The last paragraph should be your own ideas on how you might address the issues that you discussed earlier in the essay. 750 words, 5 paragraphs

Categories
Philosophy

Write short essays in answer to the following three questions. Each answer will

Write short essays in answer to the following three questions. Each answer will be no more than
one single-spaced page in length (with normal font and margins); this will, I imagine, in the
range of 500-700 words. In answering these questions, remember that in each case you will
present Kant’s position by making an argument rather than just reporting on a fact.

Categories
Philosophy

Welfare Case Analysis Overview and Instructions If you have not done so, be sure

Welfare Case Analysis
Overview and Instructions
If you have not done so, be sure to read the Case Analysis Structure Overview.
In this case analysis you have five tasks:
Give a clear and concise explanation of the case at hand.
Give a thorough, philosophical exegesis of the relevant aspects of Walzer’s and Murray’s arguments. (Click here for some tips on how to do a successful exegesis.)
Present an argument applying the relevant philosophers to the case at hand. This should include an argument justifying who each philosopher would give the welfare to and why.
Present an argument explaining why one of the philosophers can be viewed as offering a more successful solution to the case at hand.
In no more than one paragraph, explain what solution you would propose for Rebecca and Jimmy.
Case
Consider Rebecca, a single mother of 4 who has been a long-term welfare recipient. Rebecca is a weekend meth user who often spends her money on meth. However, without her welfare money, her children would not have any food or medical treatment and would most likely be placed in foster homes where their lives could go worse than they currently are. Rebecca’s yearly welfare application is due.
Now consider Jimmy, a veteran of both Desert Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom. During the battle, Jimmy was wounded and now suffers from some moderate physical disability and post-traumatic stress. Sadly, although Jimmy tried to find a job, there weren’t many systems in place to help him re-integrate or work through his issues. Each day Jimmy begs for money at his local off-ramp. Through no fault of his own, Jimmy has fallen through the proverbial cracks. Jimmy applies for welfare.
Options
You are the welfare overseer. At most one person can get welfare. You can make ONE of the following three decisions:
Give welfare only to Rebecca
Give the welfare only to Jimmy
Don’t give any welfare

Categories
Philosophy

Welfare Forum 77 unread replies.77 replies. Instructions You are going to discus

Welfare Forum
77 unread replies.77 replies.
Instructions
You are going to discuss Welfare in terms of a current event. Your
Part I (Original Post)
Find a current event that deals with welfare and discuss it here. Be sure to bring one of this week’s readings to bear on the discussion.
Is Welfare Beneficial?
Overview
What, if anything, do we owe to each other? Do systems of redistribution help those who receive them or enslave those who pay into them? Do we have a right to assistance?
Read
Walzer
Notes on Walzer
Murray
Notes on Murray
Complete
Contribute your original (first) post and your peer reply to the Welfare Forum. (See below for a sample.)
Write your Welfare Case Analysis
Here is a former student’s Welfare Forum post. It’s a good sample. The student found an interesting Op-Ed piece, gave a brief analysis of the piece, and applied the same concepts from Murray and Walzer.
Here Links to an external site.is the original article associated with this sample
“The End of Welfare as we know it”
In the article, it gives the consequences of ending welfare to families and individuals in need of welfare. As of 2016, the motion to get rid of welfare is looking to be successful as many people are already losing their welfare. I agree that there should be a time limit to how long a person can use welfare when they are out of work and not volunteering because in my opinion, as an individual, you need to be actively working to better yourself. However, for state-by-state governments, there needs to be a more directed way to spend money on their welfare. By that, I mean that the government should analyze what the people in the state need most and act accordingly.
The numbers of those who have to drop welfare in the articles are astonishing. For example, the article states that in Arkansas, the number of welfare recipients went from 63,000 in 1995 to 9,901 in 2015. The article delves into different states and the status of welfare recipients in their respective states. Many of the government believe that those who can’t find a job; can always volunteer to receive welfare. But for some states, the volunteer places may require travel fees, work equipment, etc, all of which would require money. The states need to analyze what the people need most and act accordingly by distributing the money for welfare or increasing the time limit.
Murray would agree with the decisions of the state to start to create a stronger limit on welfare; however, he would advocate for the removal of welfare for the same reason. Though, the states seem to be unable to completely remove welfare; the states want to head in that direction as the amount of those receiving less welfare looks appealing. Murray observes the time limit would help lessen the net harm that he writes about in Law 3. However, Walzer would argue that there needs to be a membership made by the exchange of welfare for those in need. If Walzer were to look at the piece he would argue with the state that they have a moral right to help those who are starving and stop creating a time limit that may leave many starving people.

Categories
Philosophy

Explain the argument from arbitrariness for permissivism. Does this argument sho

Explain the argument from arbitrariness for permissivism. Does this argument show that extraordinary objects exist? Give a response on behalf of the conservative, and evaluate its success.

Categories
Philosophy

Explain the argument from arbitrariness for permissivism. Does this argument sho

Explain the argument from arbitrariness for permissivism. Does this argument show that extraordinary objects exist? Give a response on behalf of the conservative, and evaluate its success.

Categories
Philosophy

Read pages 29-32 of Chapter 2 of “Thinking on Screen” by Thomas Wartenberg (prov

Read pages 29-32 of Chapter 2 of “Thinking on Screen” by Thomas Wartenberg (provided)
Write 500-600 words (including intro and conclusion) addressing Wartenberg’s three conceptions of philosophy. The book is about philosophy in film, but the essay is not specifically about film (see instructions).
I’ve attached a word doc with the essay instructions and the required chapter pages.